Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (990) - TV Shows (126) - DVDs (69) - Books (70) - Music (15) - Games (210)

Outstanding

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 10:16 (A review of Sideways)

From Alexander Payne comes an outstanding and impeccably performed film, that is poignant, deeply funny, tragic and truthful, with some consistent moments of wit as well. Sideways also gets my pick as the best film of 2004, and there were a few strong films that year, however it was this film that touched me the most.

For one thing, it looks beautiful. The cinematography is stunning and the scenery is wonderfully picturesque. The music is lovely, while the direction is faultless. I also loved how engaging the story was, and how fresh it was as well, while the script is both moving and funny. As far as I could see, there were no pacing problems, it may start slow, but the quality of everything else left me transfixed.

The acting is absolutely astonishing. Paul Giamatti is brilliant as Miles, a teacher full of nervous self-loathing, while Thomas Haden Church is excellent as Jack, a deliciously deadpan sort of character who provides the laughs. Miles is the more likable character of the two I agree as you feel genuinely for him, while Virginia Madsen's character is the most likable in the film, and speaking of Virginia Madsen she was delightful in this film.

Overall, an outstanding film, nothing wrong with it as far as I could see. 10/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Kubrick's swansong his most underrated?

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 07:29 (A review of Eyes Wide Shut)

In my opinion, I think it is. Not his best mind you, I personally would put 2001, Clockwork Orange, Dr Strangelove, Full Metal Jacket and Barry Lyndon over Eyes Wide Shut, but while I haven't seen it in quite some time and have been meaning to revisit it I remember not being particularly impressed with Fear and Desire.

I like and respect Kubrick a lot. He is a great and influential director who is of great interest to me, and his skill for directing is in full evidence here. I can understand why people mayn't like Eyes Wide Shut, it is a very lengthy film and slow, but I also find it interesting and find it Kubrick's most underrated. I will admit the first two times I saw it I didn't like it, but I have seen it another three times and each time it gets better.

Like all of Kubrick's movies Eyes Wide Shut is beautifully made and edited, and has a wonderful soundtrack consisting of mostly pre-existing music with Musica Ricacarta by Ligeti standing out the most. The screenplay is mostly very good and the story is interesting. Much has been said of Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, either good or bad. In my view Cruise is good, for me it is one of his better performances, but Kidman is just terrific and is memorable in every scene she's in.

In conclusion, interesting and for me Kubrick's most underrated film. 8/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

My favourite movie of the year so far

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 06:47 (A review of Rio)

That in mind, there is more of 2011 I have yet to see, hence the so far bit, but I absolutely loved this movie after seeing it when it came out today. From the trailers and advertising it looked like a bright, breezy and entertaining animation, and in my mind it was much more than that. And I genuinely mean it when I say it is my favourite of the year so far, even surpassing the outstanding(if somewhat misunderstood) Rango.

What I loved most about Rio was its energy. Rio for me has more energy than any of the Ice Age(from the same team) movies, and its energy is truly infectious at that. Two reasons especially make it so. One is the writing, I wasn't expecting the writing to be this sharp, funny and witty, looking at some of the previous work the writer has penned, while the jokes are plentiful and come by thick and fast. The other is the soundtrack. It has a huge amount of authentic Brazilian flavour and just ripples with zest. I loved the samba and bossa nova rhythms that pulsate throughout, and further fun is to be had in the Busby Berkeley-style beginning and the truly spectacular Carnaeval finale.

The story isn't perhaps original, nor did it need to be, but it is fast-paced, with many entertaining scenes and is very rarely predictable. There is also the obligatory life lessons here which are seamlessly blended without feeling shoe-horned in or preachy. I loved the characters too. Blu is very endearing, and voiced brilliantly by The Social Network's Jesse Eisenberg. Jewel is a lovely love interest, and her chemistry with Blu is ceaselessly entertaining and cute. Anne Hathaway previously voiced Haru on the English dub of The Cat Returns. She did a fine job on that, but in Rio she is even better, more understated and less shrill. I equally loved the villainous cockatoo Nigel(who avoids being a caricature and the like and voiced phenomonally by Jermaine Clement) and the constantly drooling bull-dog.

Other than the above components, what also made Rio was its animation, which is simply stupendous. I haven't seen an animated movie in a long while(and I am a huge fan of animation) where the colours in particular are so rich and warm. The characters are also beautifully modelled especially the titular character Blu, and this includes the secondary characters as well, and the sceneries and backgrounds are breathtaking with such a refreshing richness and warmth. In conclusion, a wonderful animated film and my favourite of the year so far. 10/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

"Three Colours Trilogy": Part 2

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 06:23 (A review of Three Colours: White)

While 'Three Colours: White' may be the weakest of Krzysztof Kieslowski's "Three Colours Trilogy", that is in no way saying that it is a bad film (to me it was actually still an extremely good one) and that it's testament to the trilogy's consistently high overall quality.

'Three Colours: White' could have been a little longer to give more development to the two leads' relationship and to Julie Delpy's character perhaps, and there are a couple of parts that do strain credibility. On the whole though, it is an entertaining, sad and thought-provoking examination of equality and revenge with a story detailing love on the rocks and the aftermath of Poland's Communist Regime.

Again it is very symbolic, especially in the linking to the protagonist's past (this time with a coin and a Marianna plaster bust) and again the recycling of bottles that ties in with the film's main theme of equality. This symbolism is this said intriguing and visually arresting, instead of being incoherent, one may not get the significance of it at first but reading up about the film and analyses of it has proved to be tremendously insightful.

Visually, 'Three Colours: White' is every bit as visually stunning as the previous film 'Three Colours: Blue'. The scenery is intentionally not flattering but at the same time it is also affectionate, and the film is exquisitely shot with the use of colour bold and striking. The music is not quite as symbolic as in 'Blue', but is still very much inspired and cleverly used, with a dark jauntiness to match the blackly comedic nature of the film and also a little pathos to mirror the emotions of the protagonist.

Writing is of the true black comedy/dry humour kind, enough to make one laugh heartily and cry unashamedly, with plenty of funny and poignant moments as well as blunt and thought-provoking ones. Kieslowski's direction is never intrusive.

Zbigniew Zamachowski excels par excellence in his tragicomic role, a very funny and nuanced turn. Julie Delpy's role is not as interesting, but she does bring a formidable edge and sensuality to it.

On the whole, the weakest of the trilogy but still extremely good. 9/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

"Three Colours Trilogy": Part 3

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 06:16 (A review of Three Colours: Red (1994))

All three films in the "Three Colours Trilogy" are must watches, and even me considering 'Three Colours: White' the weakest of the three is not saying anything to discredit it. That is still a great film which is testament to the brilliance of 'Blue' and 'Red' for them to be even better.

'Three Colours: Red' is my favourite of the trilogy. Even with less emphasis on action and dialogue (though not devoid), it has the most layered, thematically rich and thought-provoking story of the trilogy. To me, 'Red' is not just the best film in the trilogy but also one of the best films seen by me in a while and one of the finest final films for any director.

It chiefly focuses on the electrifying relationship between Valentine and the judge, and like with 'Blue' being a poignant exploration of grief and liberty and 'White' a blackly entertaining one of equality and revenge 'Red' explores the theme of fraternity, as well as other themes of morality, free will and destiny, and manages to tell a powerful and thoughtful story out of those themes. Again, like 'White' and particularly 'Blue', 'Red' is heavy in symbolism, such as the recycling of bottles (here representing solidarity), the use of the colour red to emphasise the theme of fraternity, links to the protagonist's past (here with fountain pens and never shutting doors and gates) and juxtaposition of physical levels, but in a way that's always fascinating and never incomprehensible (even if it takes more than one viewing or some research to fully get the significance of it all).

Visually, while all three films are superbly made, 'Red' is perhaps the most visually stunning. The cinematography is stunning in its elegance and beauty, with bold use of colour and handsome production design. The music score is the most powerful of the three films and the most memorable and fitting, not as symbolic or as intricate as 'Blue' but stirring stuff indeed. Kieslowski's direction as ever is assured and unobtrusive, his style is unmistakable and he does a lot of interesting touches that make the film visually and dramatically fascinating.

Again, the writing is thought-provoking and makes the most of the film's rich themes. The central relationship is portrayed electrifyingly while the ending is quite the masterstroke in figuratively and literally tying the whole trilogy up. The two lead roles are immaculately acted by luminous Irene Jacob and commandingly nuanced Jean-Louis Trintignant.

In summary, a brilliant film in every sense. 10/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

"Three Colours Trilogy": Part 1

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 06:04 (A review of Three Colours: Blue (1993))

Instead of saying which is the best and worst (though have often heard 'Red' cited best and 'White' the weakest, though all three films are generally very highly thought of) of Krzysztof Kieslowski's "Three Colours" trilogy, it will just be said that all three films in the trilogy are must-watches in their own way.

The first film in the trilogy 'Three Colours: Blue' serves as a very poignant exploration of grief and liberty (in the emotional sense), and to me it is one of the most moving and interesting depictions of grief and liberty in film. It is heavily symbolic, with its intricate use of music, the dominant use of the colour blue in the colour palette, its interesting use of fade outs (though actually different to their usual use, representative of time standing still rather than it passing or a scene conclusion), links to the main character's past (here the use of falling) and the bottle recycling, but not in an incoherent sense.

Visually, 'Three Colours: Blue' looks stunning. The whole film is shot with aesthetic grace and elegance and while the use of blue is dominant for symbolic reasons it is never gimmicky or cheap. Kieslowski's direction is thoughtful and never intrusive, and the intricate music score and the symbolic way it's utilised (representing Julie's struggles with isolation) is inspired, "Song for the Unification of Europe" is one of the most emotional tracks of music in any film seen by me recently.

Story-wise, 'Three Colours: Blue' challenges in a way but also always engages, mainly because of how movingly and intensely it deals with the tragic story of Julie and its themes of grief and liberty. The pacing is deliberate but never hits a dull spot.

One of 'Three Colours: Blue' is the astonishing performance from Juliette Binoche, an intensely affecting portrayal that ranks high up with her best performances. All the cast are fine, particularly Benoรฎt Rรฉgent and Emmanuelle Riva, but in the acting stakes this is Binoche's film.

All in all, a beautiful, thought-provoking and moving film, and a wonderful start for a very interesting trilogy of films. 10/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Something of a towering achievement

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 05:45 (A review of Dekalog I)

Of the work of Krzysztof Kieslowski seen thus far ("The Three Colours Trilogy", 'The Double Life of Veronique' and 'Dekalog'), it's 'Three Colours: Red' and 'Dekalog' that stand out as particularly masterful, though there is not a dud in the lot.

'Dekalog' is simply put a towering achievement, one of the greatest mini-series ever made and a televisual masterpiece in its own right. There are not many mini-series around with a concept of this level of ambition, and 'Dekalog' executes its ambitious concept brilliantly. While some of the stories are better than others (Episodes 3 and 8 being two of the weaker ones), the weaker stories still have so many great merits that they are a long way from bad, which is testament to the brilliance of the best stories and how high-quality 'Dekalog' as an overall whole is.

Kieslowski's work is all visually stunning. Despite being a mini-series, the production values, with scenery that is both unflattering and affectionate, and atmospheric (sometimes innovative) photography are so good that mistaking 'Dekalog' as a piece of cinema is understandable, especially when there is elegiac but elegant pacing and often cinematic flow to the storytelling. Actually had to frequently check as to whether it was a mini-series and not a huge epic film that it honestly felt more like. Episodes 1 and 6 were especially impressive.

Another striking element of Kieslowski's work is the way music is composed and utilised. This is especially true in 'Three Colours: Blue' and 'The Double Life of Veronique', where it is very intricate, symbolic and like its own character. This intricate and symbolic approach to how music is written and utilised is evident in 'Dekalog' too, Episode 2 has music that is particularly mood-enhancing.

There is some truly thought-provoking and poetic writing in 'Dekalog', even though dialogue generally is minimal. There are a wide range of emotions, rich and complex themes (murder and punishment, faithfulness, idolisation, jealousy, love and passion, truth, good and evil, sex and greed), human issues and moralistic ideals used to full potential. There is also a little room for humour, not just in the more screwball comedy feel of Episode 10 Episodes 1 and 5 also have the odd darkly funny moment.

In all ten episodes, the stories are all absorbing in their own ways, with different moods (such as creepy for Episode 5, poignant for Episode 2, comedic for Episode 10, sombre for Episode 4 and spiritually resonant for Episode 8 for examples) and themes. Was really impressed at how stories were built around each of the ten commandments (although the only resemblance to them really is the episode titles, despite how it may sound upon hearing this is not to be dismissed as "religious propaganda" or anything like that), and done in a way that's somewhat deliberate in pace but gripping in atmosphere. While 'Dekalog' in no way rushes the storytelling, the power, intensity and poignancy of the stories told so intelligently makes it seldom dull.

Characters are compelling in their realism and their conflicts/situations, they are remarkably well drawn and interesting for just ten episodes at only one hour each. Kieslowski's direction is superb, showing a truly gifted director who died too soon with more to give. One couldn't have asked for more ideal performances as well, some of them are remarkably complex and understated while always natural and genuine.

Overall, a masterful towering achievement, in how much it does with its concept and for the viewer for getting so much out of a mini-series unlike any made before, during and since. 10/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A great sequel to a great first film

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 05:26 (A review of How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2014))

The original How to Train Your Dragon was a great, no, wonderful film that was not only the best DreamWorks film since The Prince of Egypt but also one of the best animated films of the 2000s. While it does start off a tad slow and not as endearingly simple as the original, this sequel was excellent(to me it beats Kung Fu Panda 2 as the best DreamWorks sequel) and almost as good. As with the first film the animation is amazing, and actually even better than that of the first, the character designs are a touch more expressive and the colours are richer and have more atmosphere. And I don't think even the first film had a character introduction as mind-blowing as that of Valka's. The soundtrack really gives the sense of fantasy and adventure and does so rousingly and beautifully. How to Train Your Dragon 2 is strongly written, with smart quirky humour, suspenseful conflict and plenty of emotional parts without being overly-sentimental. The story scores highly too with more depth and darkness than the first- which really succeeded in how simple it was- yet the quirkiness and wonder as well as the touching sentiment that was in the original film are present here as well. Which was impressive for a film that had a lot going on. The characters and their back-stories are intriguing(remarkable for a film with the amount of characters it has), especially the emotional scenes between Hiccup and his mother and the endearing man and beast friendship between Hiccup and Toothless(which maybe could have been more prominent), with the exception of the comparatively one-dimensional villain Drago, who was still malevolently voiced and well-designed. Of the characters, personal favourite is Toothless, who never speaks but has as much impact as and even more so than other characters that do, who is even more expressive and adorable as in the original. The voice acting is excellent, especially from Jay Baruchel and Gerard Butler. In conclusion, a great sequel and almost as good. 9/10 Bethany Cox


0 comments, Reply to this entry

One of my comfort shows and guilty pleasures

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 04:34 (A review of Pretty Little Liars)

Warning: Spoilers
"If you want a happy ending that depends, of course, on where you stop your story."

Pretty Little Liars is a teenage drama/mystery that explores the lives of four girls: Aria, Emily, Spencer and Hanna. Throughout the first season they are trying to unearth the mystery surrounding the disappearance and supposed murder of their close friend Alison DiLaurentis. One year after her disappearance the girls receive anonymous texts from a mysterious figure that calls itself 'A'. After binge watching the first three episodes, I was completely engrossed in the story and fell in love with the five main characters, despite their inherent flaws.

Every character can be related to in one way or another and are immensely likeable. Sure, the characters are flawed and have some less than endearing moments. My favourite character is Hanna Marin, but to be honest I love all the characters, even Alison. I love that each character has their own personality and likes and dislikes. Alison is the toxic friend, Emily is the good natured, rather introverted type, Aria is a rebel and prior to Alison's death a goth, Spencer is a book worm and the smart one of the bunch and Hanna is the fun, goofy and the not so innocent friend.

Season 2 Episode 25 will always be memorable and stand out the most for me. It is a well-crafted and a beautifully executed finale. 'A' was finally revealed, and it was truly a shocker. Mona Vanderwall is 'A.' She has tormented the girls since the very first episode. I definitely did not see it coming. Mona was never one of my top contenders of who 'A' could be.

The season 2 finale revealed that there are multiple 'A' characters lurking in the shadows. The fourth season revealed that Ezra Fitz is supposedly 'A' and had an intimate relationship with Alison. This was truly a shocker and made me look at the character in a whole new light. It later turned out that Ezra is not 'A' nor is affiliated with it. He took the teaching position at Rosewood High to work on his novel about the mystery surrounding Alison and how her friends cope with it. He literally stalked the girls just to get research for his book. Aria should have never forgiven him for this.

From season 3 onwards, I was actually rooting for the so-called 'A-Team' rather than Aria, Spencer, Hanna and Emily. Their behaviour in the second half of the third season felt a little off. Emily became more like a typical hormonal teenager, whilst the rest acted all whiny and toxic.

The season 3 finale revealed that Alison is alive and is the girl behind the red hood. I found this revelation to be completely bonkers and incredibly far-fetched. Nevertheless, I found a newfound respect for Alison and like her better as a character in season 4B, season 5 and beyond. She became a likeable character. Sasha Pieterse is the youngest actress in the series yet is immensely talented.

There are numerous red herrings in each season that will likely discombobulate the viewer. Each new reveal may result in confusion and the urge to revisit earlier episodes and see if there are any glaring plot holes.

Throughout its run, Pretty Little Liars was known for romanticising student-teacher relationships. Chief among them, is Ezra and Aria's relationship. I never shipped them and only accepted them as friends. Why are the PLL writers trying to romanticise this type of relationship?

Pretty Little Liars remained fairly consistent throughout its seven-season run. Although, no season wasn't necessarily bad or unwatchable, there were still some fewer appealing episodes. Season 5B, in particular, had the most disappointing episodes, in my opinion.

The season 5 finale "Welcome to the Dollhouse" probably took inspiration from Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House." This episode was one of Pretty Little Liars finest episodes and top tier. It is right on par with the season 2 finale titled "Unmasked." The writing, acting, soundtrack and costumes are all phenomenal. The payoff is huge and unbelievable.

Ashley Benson, Troian Bellisario, Lucy Hale, Shay Mitchell and Sasha Pieterse have amazing chemistry, and this only becomes clearer throughout the seasons. All of them portray their respective characters flawlessly. The show also benefits from a great supporting cast. Keegan Allen as Toby, Ian Harding as Ezra, Chad Lowe as Byron, Holly Marie Combs as Ella, Laura Leighton as Ashley, Janel Parrish as Mona, Tammin Sursok as Jenna and Tyler Blackburn as Caleb are perfectly casted and bring something to the table.

Perhaps the only complaint I have with the series is that the writing feels at times off and a little clunky. It is surprisingly (for the most part) not cheesy and does not have some cringeworthy moments. It is a well-made teenage drama with suspense and intrigue that kept the momentum going and stayed fairly consistent.

The biggest issue I have with Pretty Little Liars is how time is handled on the show. When you think about it, the girls have been in senior year for three and a half seasons. In a short time span, a lot of things happen that might raise some eyelids.

The four girls were at their worst behaviour in season 5B. They honestly thought that Alison is 'A.' I just thought that their performance in that season was overtly negative and dramatic.

Pretty Little Liars had one of the best and worst reveals in television history. The season 6 mid-season finale revealed the identity of 'A' and it was incredibly disappointing and nonsensical. It turned out that CeCe Drake is Charles/Charlotte DiLaurentis. I honestly expected a much bigger payoff and thought that 'A' would be someone completely different. Charlotte's motive seemed unclear. After the episode, there were still burning questions that needed to be answered. The episode was poorly executed and felt rushed. They could have dedicated one more episode in present day to wrap up loose ends and to resolve any glaring plot holes. I agree with the general consensus that the reveal was disappointing and lacklustre.

I was kind of lukewarm when the show jumped 5 years ahead in time. I thought that the first couple episodes were quite lacklustre and uneventful. It took some time till the story moved forward. The seventh season handles the 5-year time jump much better than season 6B.

In season 7, Spencer's true lineage is revealed, and it is a shocker. It turns out that Mary Drake (aka Jessica DiLaurentis's twin) is Spencer's birth mother and gave her up for adoption moments after she was born. This revelation was surprising, to say the least.

Season 7 episode 14 had a bunch of reveals. For starters, it finally confirmed that Mary Drake killed her sister Jessica DiLaurentis. Also, Charles/Charlotte's father turned out to be Pastor Ted. Lukas was close friends with Charles before he switched his gender. The most shocking reveal, in my opinion, is Alison finding out that A. D. stole Emily's eggs from the donation bank, fertilised them and used them to impregnate Alison. Overall, season 7 episode 14 is such a nerve-racking episode of Pretty Little Liars.

It was so much fun theorising of who 'A' or 'A. D.' could be. One of the things I love about the show is that it keeps you on your toes and keeps you guessing till the very end. My relationship with PLL will last for eternity. As the title of the series finale perfectly put it: "Til DeAth Do Us PArt."

The series finale revealed the identity of A. D., and it was profoundly confusing and insane. Alex Drake aka Spencer's long lost evil twin is A. D. Even though the reveal was surprising, it is not the best reveal of Pretty Little Liars. The Mona reveal in the season 2 finale will always stand out the most for me and is the most shocking and exhilarating. I would have preferred if the series dedicated some episodes to Alex Drake's backstory. It felt a little rushed and quite anticlimactic how her story ended. But I got to say it was truly fitting when it is revealed that Mona locked Mary and Alex in a dollhouse. I don't necessarily have a problem with the A. D. reveal, but it could have been better executed and hinted at.

I kind of suspected that Wren would be the father to Alison and Emily's twins. It would have been nice to see their reaction to this revelation.

Troian Bellisario absolutely nailed Alex Drake's British accent. It really showcased her acting range and proved that she is one of the most talented actors on Pretty Little Liars.

The series finale is perhaps the cheesiest episode of Pretty Little Liars. Although my feelings toward the finale is conflicted, I still think that it wrapped up the overarching story in a good way. It answered the most burning questions and did not make me crave for more. It also managed to make me want to revisit previous episodes and see what I missed. As a finale, it delivered and served as a satisfying conclusion to the series.

To conclude, Pretty Little Liars is a fun and addictive series with a great mystery that is stretched out throughout multiple seasons. The series creator does a great job at not making the mystery feel dragged out. Each episode entices the viewer to keep watching. The series has a well-rounded cast who have amazing chemistry. Each season offers something new and exciting with a bunch of twists and turns. It is one hundred percent bingeable and one of the best mystery television shows on Netflix.

One of the best lines: "A. D. stopped playing games and started playing God." 'A' has always been a God.

Side note: I love how the series finale introduced a new generation of Pretty Little Liars. This just makes the series as a whole come full circle.

Season 1A: 8.0/10 Season 1B: 8.2/10 Season 2A: 8.2/10 Season 2B: 8.2/10 Season 3A: 8.2/10 Season 3B: 7.9/10 Season 4A: 8.5/10 Season 4B: 8.5/10 Season 5A: 7.8/10 Season 5B: 7.8/10 Season 6A: 8.1/10 Season 6B: 6.8/10 Season 7A: 8.2/10 Season 7B: 8.6/10

Series finale (part 1): 9.3/10 Series finale (part 2): 6.5/10

Final verdict: 9.0/10

Kisses, -A.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Decent sequel, but inferior to the first film.

Posted : 2 years, 5 months ago on 4 June 2022 01:55 (A review of The Legend of Zorro)

The first film was very entertaining, with some well-choreographed sword fights and a witty script. The sequel while entertaining on the most part, is definitely inferior in comparison. What I did like about the sequel was the cinematography, it was very handsome like in the first film. The performances from Banderas and Zeta Jones are impressive , not so much the boy who played their son. (can't remember his name). The costumes were lovely The script wasn't too bad, but a little underdeveloped at times. I will confess I was disappointed in the sword fights, they seemed more like slapstick and a little too clumsy to my liking. The main flaw was the plot, it was a very good idea, but it felt rushed, and it felt as though the director was trying to cram too much into a simple storyline. I also wished they made the villains, played adequately by Rufus Sewell and Michael Emerson, more interesting. I liked the music by James Horner, but you do wish sometimes in the more dramatic scenes, that Hans Zimmer would have been a more appropriate choice. Overall, not bad, but doesn't hold a candle to the first film. 6/10 Bethany Cox.


0 comments, Reply to this entry